Sabev & Partners - Law firm English version|Българска версия|Руская версия
About S&PProjectsClientsPublicationsLinksContact us
Juridical press Publications in the press
 
PDFIs that possible to obtain a collateral right over chattels under art. 78 of the Ownership Act , 1/8/2003

Автор: Stefan Stefanov | Източник:Commercial Law Magazine, vol. 4/2003


PDFIs that possible to obtain a collateral right over shares under art. 78 of the Ownership Act and art. 471 (2) of the Commercial Act , 1/6/2003

Автор: Stefan Stefanov | Източник:Commercial Law Magazine, vol. 3/2003


PDFThe terms ‘onerous’ and ‘gratuitous’ in the light of collateral agreements , 1/5/2003

Автор: Stefan Stefanov | Източник:SIBI, 2003


PDFThe bill of exchange’s corpus in the context of the terms ‘conscientiousness’ and ‘bad faith’ , 1/4/2003

Автор: Stefan Stefanov | Източник:Commercial Law Magazine, vol. 2/2003


PDFIs the inchoate lien admitted by the Bulgarian Supreme Court of Cassation (review on the bench legislation of the Bulgarian Supreme Court Chamber) , 1/12/2001

Автор: Stefan Stefanov | Източник:Commercial Law, vol. 6/2001


PDFPurpose of the legal requirement for reasoning of commercial transactions , 1/10/2001

Автор: Stefan Stefanov | Източник:Commercial Law Magazine, vol. 5/2001


PDFAre the bill of exchange transactions abstract , 1/8/2001

Автор: Stefan Stefanov | Източник:Commercial Law Magazine, vol. 4/2001


PDFCivil liability in the case of breach of contract , 1/6/2000

Автор: Stefan Stefanov | Източник:Commercial Law Magazine, vol. 3/2000


PDFProblems of the appeal procedure of Taxation Acts , 10/1/2000

The feature is an analysis of the problems of the tax appeal of the taxation acts (TA). The suggestions are made that an improvement should be made upon the statutory instruments thereof.
The acceptance (expess and tacit), the alteration and abrogation of TA are threshed out. After thorough analysis of the procedures of the administrative appeal and the subsequent one in court of TA the weak points of the now valid statutory instruments which regulates these relations are pointed out  to as the conclusions made are supported by actual practice of the Supreme Administrative Tribunal and the Constitutional Court. It is proved that some principles and proceedings in the now valid statutory instruments of the tax proceedings contradict the authorised by the Constitution of Republic of Bulgaria common clause of appeal of administrative acts. It is also pointed out to the contradictions between the general law regulating the proceeding of the administration - The Administrative Proceeding Law - and the special law - The Tax Proceeding Law. Some practical solutions of how to observe the contradictory statutory instruments of the administrative and legal control over TA are given.
The feature is published on the eve of the enactment of the new Code of Tax Procedure (CTP) at a time when the bill was under hot public debate. The newly passed CTP settled the problems dealt in the feature in a way which utterly conforms to the Constitution of Republic of Bulgaria and the objectives of Law.


Автор: Katilin Popov | Източник:Law Thought Magazine, vol. 4/1999


 
About us | Projects | Clients | Publications | Links | Contact us
Copyright © 2003 Sabev&Partners. All rights reserved.
Development by Melontech.com